In short, everything you just read was self-centered; a journey into psychological egoism. For example, Alberti is, most likely, a distant relative. My grandfather substituted an "a" for an "i"; thus, my last name is Alberta. Also, my Maternal Haplogroup is HV1b2, and my Paternal Haplogroup is E-L29. So, where did the Agency come from? My head.
My primary source of information is the world's most exhaustive and up-to-date encyclopedia, Wikipedia. "My content" is built explicitly from Wikipedia to solve communication problems in a new context. The concept relies on remix practices, which blur distinctions between invented and borrowed work. The composition of this book was undertaken as a problem-solving activity rather than a demonstration of original ideas. I believe all writing situations are, centrally, problems to be solved.
Because Wikipedia is edited and produced by such a large pool, revisiting pages relevant to this subject matter (over a few years at least) was essential. I'd cut-and-paste Wikipedia articles on Alberti and the 15th-century into a Google Doc. Then I superimpose Wikipedia's historical timelines over ™'s content, matching similar dates. As time passed, a convergence of historical events started to resemble a fractal. Similarly, if you measure something long enough you’ll find ϕ and π in anything. While taking those very measurements, you will also find all kinds of unrelated sequences and ratios.
Lastly, I applied the Agency narrative to hold it all together. After drafting the content, I ran the chapters through Grammarly for possible plagiarism and had my historian friend edit it.
Edgar Allan Poe 1st brought cryptograms to newspaper stands; he coined the term "cryptography." He also said: "There is no greater mistake than supposing that true originality is a mere matter of impulse or inspiration. To originate is carefully, patiently, and understandingly to combine."
In this book, I tried to challenge established notions of originality. All history gets revised constantly through the folk process. The oldest living example of remix culture is found in religious institutions. Most of our sacred texts have been reinterpreted and published in different languages worldwide. In some cases, they become a form of satire. Such parodies date back to the development of writing.
I trust that mainstream historians will reject folding history into the 15th-century as it is inconsistent with modern dating techniques used in the wider scholarly community. In truth, no one knows to what extent history is fact or fiction - unless you or I were there.
Granted, rejecting commonly accepted dating methods is foolish - people make extensive, rigorous examinations that have been refined for centuries. Having said that, most archaeological, paleographical, and carbon methods of dating sources seem to be contradictory.
As cancel-culture perpetuates itself, we must prevent repeating lessons that aren't learned. Sure cuneiform tablets, papyrus, and books can be burned, but digital history can be deleted in seconds. Nonetheless, I use digital media to further historical presentation and analysis for better or worse. This branch of the digital humanities cannot be trusted as it's vulnerable to corruption.
The Chronology of Ancient Kingdoms Amended was written by Isaac Newton. It represents his foray into timelines, detailing the records of various remixes throughout antiquity. He claims Solomon was the earliest King in the world and that his temple was the 1st ever built, with all others being copies.
Newton's results diverge widely from accepted dates, even more broadly than the system he attempted to displace. I think Newton got a glimpse of the Jungian eternal return but misinterpreted it. One can take any recorded figure and draw such parrels. I believe had Newton really "drilled down," he would have concluded that he was the earliest King of the world and that his temple - was the 1st ever built!
Newtonian cosmology demonstrates my cyclical theory of time as a mathematical certainty. The probability of a world being precisely like our own is 0. Space and time are infinite. It follows logically that your life must recur an endless number of times.
Repetition of similar chronological events has been applied to the rises and falls of military superpowers, but why? To me, Fomenko's databases relate to the philosophy of predeterminism in that we are predestined to repeat the same patterns through similar events perpetually, provided we don't identify the sequences and advance. Fomenko's statistical correlation of texts can also consider the idea of infinite time. Meaning a finite amount of events will recur again and again, perpetually. Our present is the key to our past. Identifying the systematic patterns of deviation from rationality in judgment is essential.
Our societies evolve by mechanisms analogous to biology. That's why the field of evolutionary psychology explains the human psyche in terms of adaptation to our shared ancestral environment.This recursive nature of primordial patterns is evident in how a branch is a miniature replica of the tree it stems.
Thanks for reading :)